People Science Logo

People Science

Hire Great People

How do you hire great people? Here's what the research says...

Updated 10/16/2017

Great hiring practices set you up for success.

Companies that use high-performance staffing practices to hire great people are more productive, profitable, and recover faster from economic recessions7,13,15,21,27.

Structured interviews are way more effective than unstructured.

If you aren't using a structured interview, then your interview process is a waste of time and effort. Even your most experienced hiring managers can't distinguish between high and low potential team members using unstructured interviews11,12,25.

An interview with Logan Loomis about why structured interviews matter so that we can look beneath our instant like/dislike biases into performance eligibility and suitability:

There are several solid predictors of job performance.

Use well developed assessments to identify the best candidates and hire great people. The best predictors of job performance are:

Cognitive Ability

Any brain-based skill. Some examples are memory, attention, perception, executive functioning, and language20,23,34.


The personality trait of being careful, or vigilant. Shows as efficient, organized, goal oriented4,26,31,39.


The quality of being honest and having strong moral principles9,10,33,35.

Job Knowledge

Demonstrated relevant abilities such as policies, procedures, and the relationship of work to the organization’s mission16,23.

Hiring is a two-way street. Put your best foot forward.

The best candidates are carefully evaluating you and your company at the same time that you're judging their suitability. Poor hiring practices result in negative impressions and decrease your ability to attract the best talent8,14,19,22,36.

Before you can hire great people, they have to apply!

The size of your pool of qualified applicants is a critical factor in hiring effectiveness18,37.

Describe the job clearly and don't gloss over realities.

Accurate job descriptions and realistic job previews can substantially decrease turnover. Hire great people who understand the job you are offering and are truly passionate to excel in it6,17,41,42.

Pre-employment drug screening is worthwhile.

For entry-level jobs, pre-employment drug testing can reduce forced separations and absenteeism by 50 to 60 percent29,32.

Aim for star talent in your most critical roles.

Ensure that you have performance stars filling your mission critical jobs2,3,24.

Beware falsified resumes!

Applicants often elaborate, embellish, and lie on their resumes. Once you've narrowed the pool, a quick background or reference check can screen out candidates who may end up causing a great deal of trouble if hired1,28,30,38.

How you choose predicts when they leave.

Using high performance hiring practices not only helps you hire great people, it results in decreased turnover5.

To protect your company, follow the guidelines for making hiring decisions. For assistance, consult an attorney specializing in employment law.

EEOC Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection40


  1. Adler, S. (1993). Verifying a job candidate’s background: The state of practice in a vital human resources activity. Review of Business, 15(2), 3.'s-Background%3A-The-State-a-Adler/d60d8668cc7916d92bf5f896b9121f446d816ad1
  2. Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2015). The secret sauce for organizational success. Organizational Dynamics, 44(3), 161–168.
  3. Aguinis, H., O’Boyle, E., Gonzalez-Mulé, E., & Joo, H. (2016). Cumulative advantage: Conductors and insulators of heavy-tailed productivity distributions and productivity stars. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 3–66.
  4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
  5. Barrick, M. R., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2005). Reducing voluntary, avoidable turnover through selection. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 159–166.
  6. Baur, J. E., Ronald Buckley, M., Bagdasarov, Z., & S. Dharmasiri, A. (2014). A historical approach to realistic job previews: An exploration into their origins, evolution, and recommendations for the future. Journal of Management History, 20(2), 200–223.
  7. Becker, E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53–101.
  8. Bell, B. S., Wiechmann, D., & Ryan, A. M. (2006). Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 455–466.
  9. Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Wiemann, S. (2007). A review of recent developments in integrity test research. Personnel Psychology, 60(2), 271–301.
  10. Camara, W. J., & Schneider, D. L. (1994). Integrity tests: Facts and unresolved issues. American Psychologist, 49(2), 112–119.
  11. Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50(3), 655–702.
  12. Campion, M. A., Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 25–42.
  13. Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2011). Invited editorial: Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital–based competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1429–1443.
  14. Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (2003). Procedural justice and organizational staffing: A tale of two paradigms. Human Resource Management Review, 13(1), 7–39.
  15. Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949–969.
  16. Dye, D. A., Reck, M., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The validity of job knowledge measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1(3), 153–157.
  17. Earnest, D. R., Allen, D. G., & Landis, R. S. (2011). Mechanisms linking realistic job previews with turnover: A meta-analytic path analysis. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 865–897.
  18. Gatewood, R., Feild, H. S., & Barrick, M. (2015). Human resource selection (8 edition). Cengage Learning.
  19. Gilliland, S. W. (1995). Fairness from the applicant’s perspective: Reactions to employee selection procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 3(1), 11–18.
  20. Gottfredson, L. S. (1986). The g factor in employment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29(3), 293–296.
  21. Greer, C. R., Carr, J. C., & Hipp, L. (2016). Strategic staffing and small-firm performance. Human Resource Management, 55(4), 741–764.
  22. Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 639–683.
  23. Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29(3), 340–362.
  24. Huselid, M. A., Beatty, R. W., & Becker, B. E. (2005). A players or a positions? The strategic logic of workforce management. Harvard Business Review, 83(12).
  25. Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., & Higgins, C. A. (2000). The employment interview: A review of recent research and recommendations for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 10(4), 383–406.
  26. Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621–652.
  27. Kim, Y., & Ployhart, R. E. (2014). The effects of staffing and training on firm productivity and profit growth before, during, and after the Great Recession. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 361–389.
  28. Lachnit, C. (2002). Protecting people and profits with background checksnan. Workforce.Com, August.
  29. Mcdaniel, M. A. (1988). Does pre-employment drug use predict on-the-job suitability? Personnel Psychology, 41(4), 717–729.
  30. Meyer, M. (2002). HR Magazine: Agenda Employment: Background Checks In Focus. SHRM, January.
  31. Mount, M., Ilies, R., & Johnson, E. (2006). Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 591–622.
  32. Normand, J., Salyards, S. D., & Mahoney, J. J. (1990). An evaluation of preemployment drug testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 629–639.
  33. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 679–703.
  34. Ree, M. J., Earles, J. A., & Teachout, M. S. (1994). Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 518–524.
  35. Sackett, P. R., & Wanek, J. E. (1996). New developments in the use of measures of honesty integrity, conscientiousness, dependability trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 49(4), 787–829.
  36. Smither, J. W., Reilly, R. R., Millsap, R. E., At&T, K. P., & Stoffey, R. W. (2006). Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46(1), 49–76.
  37. Taylor, H. C., & Russell, J. T. (1939). The relationship of validity coefficients to the practical effectiveness of tests in selection: Discussion and tables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23(5), 565–578.
  38. Taylor, P. J., Pajo, K., Cheung, G. W., & Stringfield, P. (2004). Dimensionality and validity of a structured telephone reference check procedure. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 745–772.
  39. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (2006). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44(4), 703–742.
  40. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2018). UNIFORM GUIDELINES ON EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURES. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, July.
  41. Wanous, J. P. (1973). Effects of a realistic job preview on job acceptance, job attitudes, and job survival. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58(3), 327–332.
  42. Wanous, J. P. (1989). Installing a realistic job preview: Ten tough choices. Personnel Psychology, 42(1), 117–134.
© Copyright Coetic 2014-2020. All rights reserved. Updated 2020-09-01.